|
 |
- NOTE: This
article was first published in 2003. Since the technology has been
advancing rapidly, facts, views and opinions expressed here may be
outdated.
-
-

- Introduction
::: This is a subject debated on
various internet newsgroups and forums. In this article I’m going to
vent my personal opinions on it. The conclusion at the end is
therefore open for discussion as you may disagree with one or more
items in this article. Yes, I’m biased and yes I have developed a
weak spot for digital. However, the purpose of this article is to
lift the general discussion on comparing pixel counts to a higher
level. Certainly that issue is important, but there is more to it
than just pixels. Items to discuss are:
-
Film
-
::: Film is an analog medium, so it doesn't have
"pixels" per se. The finest films (which are ‘slow’ and need a lot
of (sun)light or flash, e.g. ISO 25, have very fine grains. Finer
grains means more grains per inch. Your image could show more
detail which allows you to enlarge you picture to a bigger size
without visible deterioration. A 35mm film can potentially contain
between 10 an 15 mega pixels worth of resolution (approx. 4500 x
3000 pixels) . If you are really going obtain all the advantages
of this resolution will depend on the lighting conditions and
especially on quality of the optics used. Currently the latest
generation of Pro Digital Cameras are reaching these resolutions,
but only at prices that are 5 to 10 times the price of an
equivalent analog (film) camera.
::: Next to pixel count (resolution or ISO rating)
there is also the other thing to consider. On a film, as it is a
analog medium, each grain can be set to display any color, color
intensity and brightness. On a digital camera digital camera this
is limited by the "colordepth" as each pixel can be set to a
limited number of levels. More on this at the digital part of this comparisation.
::: If you want to
get the maximum out of the advantage of film you need to use the
best optics you can get for your camera system. Cheap optics can
have a low resolving power due to imperfections in the glass
quality and the coatings used. Also sharpness, brightness and
contrast depend strongly on the quality of your lenses.
::: An important consideration is that you don't know
how good your images are until they are processed at the lab.
Furthermore you have to pay for all your pictures whether the are
good or bad. There is also little you can do to post process your
shot unless you have access to a well equipped darkroom.
-
-
Digital
-
:::
Currently (Oct.2003), the highest resolution
available is 14 mega pixels with a very expensive professional
camera. But 6 Mega-pixel pro-sumer digital SLR cameras can already be
obtained for around $1500,-. These SLR cameras are capable of
producing a 3000 x 2000 pixels image. This is obvious far less
than the resolution film, but only if you are comparing it with
the finest grain films and with the lenses with the highest
resolving power. On the other end however, a 6 MP image is more
than capable of producing a A4 size image.
::: Digital SLR
cameras have a larger image sensors than the average pocket digicams.
It is fair to say that a digital SLR produces a better image than
a pocket camera with the same resolution. There are two major
reasons for this. First of all, the larger image sensor of an SLR is less sensitive for stray electrical signals. A smaller
sized sensor produces more ‘noise’. This can be visible as small
variations in color and tone in the image. As the ‘amplifiers’ in
the sensor make the electrical signals stronger with each higher
ISO setting, the amount of noise will also increase. You can
compare this with bigger grains on high speed conventional film.
::: The advantages
of digital are numerous and well known. Direct results on your LCD
make it possible to re-shoot and adjust your composition or
exposure as needed. Ad ones you have bought your equipment, there
is (almost) no cost for additional pictures you take. Just store
them on a CD. If you want some prints, you can send them to your
local photolab and print only the best of your shots instead of a
whole roll of conventional film. These advantages make it easy for
you to experiment and try things you would avoid with film. More
shots increases the chances of good images and also it increases
your learning curves, which eventually makes you a better
photographer!
-
-
Conclusion
-
::: What do you want to do with your images ? That
is the primary question you should ask yourself. If one wants to
make an A3 size (or larger) print with superb professional quality
you should consider a professional 35mm film and expensive
equipment. Also if you don’t have any affiliation with computers,
than you probably should stay with film as digital requires you to
store your files or to do some post processing.
::: If you want to
get superb quality, large pictures, you still need to go for the
conventional, top of the line analog film camera. Digital is going
through a (fast) stage of development, but is yet not capable of
reaching the resolution of top quality film. However, in the right
hands, it is currently possible to produce an equal or better
result than with an "average" film camera.
::: If one is
primarily concerned with taking relatively small images for email
or to use on a web page, then an inexpensive digital camera will be
good enough. A good digital camera system (compact or SLR) is
nowadays capable of producing very good results. With some
appropriate post-processing you are able to create artistic and
creative results.
-

|